![]() ![]() Finally, among the two dozen Linux distributions cited on a MakeUseOf webpage, it tentatively appeared that it could be worthwhile, under present circumstances, to try Bodhi Linux, which (like Puppy Linux) was supposedly very adaptable to older (and perhaps generally less cooperative) hardware.īased on writeups for these distributions, I decided to try Mint, Debian, Puppy, CTKArch, and Bodhi. Another webpage, while again mentioning largely these same distros, also suggested that CTKArch provided the fastest live CD. ![]() Along with Ubuntu, for my purposes one webpage suggested Linux Mint (a Ubuntu variant) a Lifehacker page echoed that and also mentioned Fedora, Debian, and maybe OpenSUSE a Techradar webpage named these same distros and added Puppy Linux to the list. I searched for favored distributions, looking particularly for those that seemed to be well-supported and robust (i.e., most likely to roll over hardware problems that would stop others). ![]() I wondered if a different Linux distribution might fare better. Generally, the distributions seeming to support the largest numbers of architectures were Debian (on which Ubuntu was based) and Gentoo, but many distributions were said to support the x86-64 architecture. But I saw there that, while Knoppix did not claim to, Ubuntu did. I looked at the architecture table in that Wikipedia page, to find a version of Linux that would support a 64-bit system. The preceding paragraph seemed to address some of those ordinary suggestions.Īs I browsed a Wikipedia comparison of Linux distributions, it occurred to me that the problem might be that the desktop computer was a 64-bit machine, whereas the other computers on which I had previously tested these CDs and USB drives were 32-bit. Some of the answers posted in response to other questions of this sort were addressed to common troubleshooting steps (e.g., make sure the CD was burned properly make sure the machine was set to boot from CD). #UBUNTU 10.10 UNIVERSAL USB INSTALLER WINDOWS 7#It seemed, moreover, to be a problem with Linux specifically, on that specific computer: the computer would boot and run a Windows 7 Repair/Recovery CD, and would also run GParted, but not Knoppix, from the YUMI drive.Ī search seemed to indicate that this was a common problem. The second such comment indicated that the problem I was now experiencing seemed to be related to the specific computer, since Ubuntu had booted successfully from these same CD/USB sources on other machines. The just-cited post on YUMI was followed by a couple of comments. I was doing this at a time when I was distracted by other projects and especially unwilling to devote time to this particular issue hence, this post wound up being long and tangled, where in other circumstances I would have broken it out into two or more shorter and more focused pieces. I had both versions available on CD and also on a YUMI multiboot USB drive. I was trying, without success, to boot a desktop machine, using Ubuntu 10.10 or 12.04. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |